How pavers carry vehicle loads — the mechanics in plain English
Unlike monolithic concrete slabs that distribute loads across their entire thickness, pavers for driveways rely on a system approach where multiple components work together. When a vehicle wheel applies force to a paver surface, the load spreads downward and laterally through several layers: the paver unit itself, the bedding sand, the compacted aggregate base, and finally the native subgrade.
Interlock is the critical mechanism. Individual pavers transfer load to adjacent units through friction at vertical joints and horizontal shear resistance from joint-fill material. A properly installed paver system behaves as a flexible pavement, allowing slight vertical movement that redistributes stress across dozens of units rather than concentrating it in one location. This explains why pavers often outperform rigid pavements in poor soil conditions—they accommodate differential settlement without catastrophic cracking.
Wheel loads concentrate force over small contact areas, typically measuring just a few square inches per tire. Point loads are far more demanding than distributed pedestrian traffic. The bedding layer—usually 25–40mm of coarse sand—cushions impact and facilitates load transfer to the base. The aggregate base layer, compacted to minimum 95% Standard Proctor density, provides structural capacity and prevents subgrade pumping under repeated loading.
Subgrade stiffness determines long-term performance. Soft, expansive, or poorly drained soils require deeper bases, geotextile reinforcement, or even geogrid stabilisation to prevent progressive deformation. Edge restraint systems prevent lateral creep that destroys interlock; without proper edging, perimeter pavers slide outward under load and the entire field eventually fails through loss of confinement.
Material properties that matter (compressive strength, flexural strength, absorption)
Key lab metrics to request and what they mean
Compressive strength measures resistance to crushing under direct vertical load. Natural stone pavers typically exhibit compressive strengths ranging from 20 MPa (soft limestone) to over 150 MPa (dense granite or engineered stone). While high compressive strength suggests durability, it’s not the only predictor of vehicle performance—distribution of load through the paver system means individual units rarely experience their theoretical crushing limit.
Modulus of rupture (flexural strength or bend strength) indicates resistance to breaking when supported at edges and loaded at center—mimicking how pavers behave when bedding sand consolidates unevenly. Flexural strength is often more critical than compressive strength for vehicle applications because pavers can crack from bending stress before they crush. Values typically range from 3 MPa to 15+ MPa depending on material and thickness.
Water absorption affects freeze-thaw durability in cold climates and correlates loosely with density. Lower absorption (under 3% by mass) generally indicates denser, stronger stone. High-absorption pavers risk spalling and progressive weakening in freeze-thaw or wet environments, compromising long-term load-bearing capacity.
Abrasion resistance predicts surface wear under tire traffic. Tests like ASTM C241 or C1353 measure material loss after simulated abrasion. White limestone and marble show moderate abrasion resistance; porcelain and dense granite excel. Surface finish also matters—honed or textured finishes hide wear better than highly polished surfaces.
Why stone type and finish change real-world performance
White limestone driveway pavers vary enormously in strength and durability depending on geological origin, grain structure, and porosity. Dense, recrystallised limestone approaches marble in hardness and performs well under vehicles. Soft, fossiliferous limestone with high porosity may crush or spall under concentrated wheel loads, especially when saturated.
Engineered stone and porcelain pavers offer consistent, high-strength alternatives with superior abrasion resistance and minimal water absorption. These products often carry explicit vehicle-rating certifications because manufacturing controls ensure batch-to-batch consistency that natural stone cannot match. White porcelain pavers rated for vehicular use typically meet or exceed 40 MPa compressive strength with flexural strength over 20 MPa.
Surface finish affects both traction and durability. Thermal (flamed) or textured finishes provide slip resistance and distribute contact stress better than polished surfaces. Natural cleft finishes on stone can hide minor wear but may show spalling more readily than uniform surfaces.
Ask your supplier for:
- Complete technical data sheet (TDS) with compressive and flexural strength
- ASTM C99 or equivalent modulus of rupture test results
- Water absorption values (ASTM C97)
- Abrasion test results (ASTM C241 or C1353)
- Freeze-thaw performance data for cold climates
- Vehicle-rating certification or application guidelines
- Sample blocks from production lot for independent verification
Typical paver thicknesses & vehicle-rating guidance
Paver thickness correlates directly with load-bearing capacity, though installation quality matters as much as unit dimensions. Industry practice segments applications by expected loading:
Pedestrian use typically employs 30–40mm thick pavers over moderate base preparation. These units lack the mass and stiffness to resist vehicle loads without risk of cracking.
Light vehicle / residential driveway applications generally specify 60–80mm thick pavers when proper subbase and edge restraint are provided. This thickness category accommodates passenger cars, SUVs, and light pickup trucks with proper installation. Many manufacturers explicitly rate 60mm+ units as vehicle-rated pavers for residential driveways with appropriate base construction.
Heavy vehicle / commercial aprons require 80–100mm pavers or specialty interlocking systems designed for truck traffic. Delivery zones, fire lanes, and commercial driveways experience higher axle loads and more frequent trafficking than residential drives.
Thickness alone doesn’t guarantee performance. A 60mm paver installed over poorly compacted base will fail faster than a 50mm unit over engineered subbase. Edge conditions also govern—pavers at unsupported edges experience maximum bending stress and should be thicker or reinforced.
Decision table: Use-case and typical specifications
| Use case | Typical paver thickness | Base depth (aggregate) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pedestrian only | 30–40mm | 100–150mm | Not suitable for vehicles |
| Light vehicle (residential cars) | 60–80mm | 150–200mm | Most common white pavers driveway weight capacity application; requires edge restraint |
| Heavy vehicle (occasional trucks) | 80–100mm+ | 250–300mm+ | Commercial delivery zones; may require geogrid reinforcement |
| Emergency vehicle access | 80–100mm+ | 300mm+ | Must meet local fire code; consult engineer for axle load calculations |
Note: Values shown are industry-typical ranges for illustration. Actual specifications must be determined by qualified engineer based on soil conditions, expected loads, and local codes. Verify with material supplier TDS.
Subbase, edge restraint & installation details that make or break vehicle performance
The strongest paver fails without proper foundation. Subbase compaction provides load-carrying capacity and prevents settlement that leads to cracking, rutting, and interlock loss. Standard residential driveway base consists of 150–200mm compacted crushed stone aggregate, placed in lifts and compacted to minimum 95% Standard Proctor density (ASTM D698).
Geotextile fabric between subgrade and aggregate base prevents soil pumping and aggregate intrusion into soft subgrade. In poor soil conditions—high clay content, expansive soils, or high water tables—geotextiles are non-negotiable. Some applications require geogrid reinforcement within the base layer to distribute loads more effectively.
Edge restraint confines the paver field and maintains interlock. Without rigid edging, perimeter pavers creep outward under wheel loads and the entire installation progressively fails. Acceptable edge restraint systems include concrete curbs, metal or plastic edge restraint systems designed for vehicular applications, or soldier-course pavers set in concrete haunching. Plastic lawn edging and unrestrained borders fail rapidly under vehicle traffic.
Bedding layer thickness and gradation matter. Use 25–40mm coarse concrete sand (ASTM C33) screeded level. Avoid fine sand or stone dust that migrates or compacts excessively. Polymeric jointing sand provides superior interlock and resists washout compared to conventional sand, though proper installation requires specific moisture and compaction procedures.
Compaction equipment must suit the scale and access. Plate compactors suffice for residential drives; larger commercial projects may require roller compaction. Proof-rolling—driving a loaded truck over the prepared base before paver installation—verifies adequate compaction and identifies soft spots.
Installation checklist for vehicle-bearing paver systems
- Subgrade preparation and proof: Excavate to design depth; proof-roll to identify soft areas; over-excavate and replace unsuitable soils or improve with geotextile/geogrid
- Geotextile installation: Place non-woven geotextile over prepared subgrade before aggregate base placement in poor soil conditions
- Aggregate base placement and compaction: Install crushed aggregate base in maximum 100mm lifts; compact each lift to minimum 95% Standard Proctor density
- Edge restraint installation: Install commercial-grade edge restraint or concrete curbs before bedding layer; ensure restraint is anchored to resist lateral forces
- Bedding layer: Screed 25–40mm coarse sand level; do not pre-compact; ensure consistent thickness
- Paver placement and pattern: Install pavers per manufacturer guidelines maintaining consistent joint width (typically 2–5mm); stagger joints to maximize interlock
- Joint filling and compaction: Fill joints completely with polymeric or angular sand; compact paver surface with plate compactor (minimum two passes); add additional joint fill as needed
- Final inspection: Verify no rocking units, consistent surface plane, complete joint fill, and secure edge restraint before allowing traffic
Tests, standards & what to ask labs for
Laboratory testing and field verification separate guesswork from engineering. The following table outlines critical tests for vehicle-bearing paver applications:
| Parameter | Test / Standard | What it indicates | Documentation to request |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compressive strength | ASTM C170 (stone) / manufacturer test | Resistance to crushing; minimum threshold varies by material type | Lab report with sample ID, test date, actual MPa value; ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation preferred |
| Flexural strength / Modulus of rupture | ASTM C99 or C880 | Resistance to bending/cracking under wheel loads; critical for vehicle use | Lab report showing MPa; specify test configuration (3-point or 4-point bend) |
| Water absorption | ASTM C97 | Density and freeze-thaw risk indicator; lower is generally better for durability | Percentage by mass; compare against material-specific thresholds |
| Abrasion resistance | ASTM C241 or C1353 | Surface wear under traffic; predicts long-term appearance retention | Abrasion index or volume loss measurement |
| Aggregate base CBR | ASTM D1883 | Subgrade and base bearing capacity; minimum typically 30–80 depending on application | Field or lab CBR value with location and depth notation |
| Base compaction verification | ASTM D698 (Standard Proctor) or D1556 (sand cone) | Confirms adequate base density; typically require 95%+ for vehicle loads | Field density test results with location grid and depth |
| Proof-rolling / Plate bearing | ASTM D1195 or visual proof-roll | Verifies overall pavement system stability before traffic | Photographic documentation or plate bearing load-deflection curve |
Request complete laboratory reports with accreditation credentials, not summary spec sheets. Test results should reference the specific production lot or quarry block proposed for your project. Generic historical data may not represent current material properties.
For natural stone, ask whether compressive and flexural tests were performed on dry or saturated samples—wet strength can be significantly lower. Specify testing conditions that match anticipated field conditions.
Real-world examples — driveways, garage aprons, light commercial aprons
Example 1: Suburban residential driveway — two-car household
Homeowner replaced asphalt drive with 60mm white limestone pavers over 175mm compacted aggregate base with geotextile underlayment. Edge restraint consisted of concrete curbs along sides and plastic edge restraint at garage threshold. Polymeric sand joints. Vehicle use limited to passenger sedans and an SUV. After three years, minimal joint sand loss and no unit failures. Periodic power-washing maintains appearance. Success factors: appropriate thickness for loading, adequate base depth, and contained edges.
Example 2: Light commercial office — delivery apron
Small professional office required occasional delivery truck access (box trucks, not tractor-trailers) across paver apron connecting parking to loading area. Design specified 80mm porcelain pavers rated for commercial vehicular use, 250mm engineered aggregate base with geogrid reinforcement in middle third, and concrete edge restraints on all sides. Periodic inspection over two years shows no rutting or cracking despite weekly delivery truck traffic. Higher initial cost justified by proven durability.
Example 3: Mountain home garage apron — freeze-thaw environment
Residential garage apron in high-elevation cold climate used 70mm dense limestone pavers selected for low water absorption and documented freeze-thaw resistance. Installation included 200mm base, geotextile separation, and soldier-course concrete-haunched perimeter. After four winter seasons, minor spalling on two pavers (replaced individually) but no structural failure. Maintenance included spring joint sand replenishment and fall drainage inspection. Performance demonstrates that material selection (low-absorption stone) and drainage design matter as much as structural capacity.
Common failure modes and how to recognise them
Rutting appears as linear depressions following wheel paths. Caused by inadequate base compaction, poor drainage allowing subgrade softening, or insufficient base depth. Remedy requires removing pavers, improving base, and reinstalling.
Edge failure presents as outward creep and settling of perimeter pavers, eventually progressing inward as interlock degrades. Results from inadequate or failed edge restraint. Repair demands installing proper edge restraint and re-setting affected areas.
Individual unit cracking typically stems from point loads on unsupported pavers (voids in bedding layer) or units too thin for the loading. Replace cracked units and investigate bedding uniformity. Widespread cracking indicates fundamental under-design.
Loss of interlock and “pumping” shows as pavers that rock when stepped on and mud or sand pumping up through joints. Indicates base failure, often from poor drainage or inadequate compaction. Requires base reconstruction.
Surface spalling or corner breakage suggests material durability problems (freeze-thaw damage, low-quality stone) or impact damage from snow removal equipment. Replace affected units and review material selection or operational practices.
When failures appear, document locations photographically and engage a qualified engineer or experienced hardscape contractor. Minor repairs may suffice, but widespread problems signal systemic installation or design deficiencies requiring major intervention.
Maintenance & upkeep for vehicle-bearing pavers
Routine maintenance extends service life and preserves appearance. Vehicle traffic introduces challenges not present in pedestrian applications: higher loads accelerate joint sand loss, tire friction degrades surfaces faster, and automotive fluids stain porous materials.
Inspect joints seasonally and replenish polymeric or angular sand as needed. Joint fill maintains interlock; depleted joints accelerate edge chipping and allow water infiltration that undermines the base. Power-wash and re-sand joints every 2–3 years or as conditions warrant.
Clean automotive fluid spills promptly. Oil, coolant, and brake fluid penetrate porous stone and cause permanent staining. Apply penetrating sealers to white limestone or other absorptive materials to improve stain resistance, though sealers require periodic reapplication.
Monitor drainage performance. Standing water indicates grade problems or clogged drainage that can soften the base and promote freeze-thaw damage. Maintain positive surface drainage and clear edge drains regularly.
Re-compact pavers if settlement or rocking develops. Remove affected pavers, adjust bedding layer, reinstall, and re-compact. Address small problems immediately before they expand.
Annual maintenance checklist for vehicle-bearing pavers
- Spring inspection: Check for winter damage, spalling, cracked units, and joint sand loss; document and replace damaged units
- Joint replenishment: Add polymeric or angular sand to any joints showing depletion; compact surface after filling
- Drainage verification: Confirm positive surface drainage, check edge drains and catch basins for obstructions
- Cleaning: Power-wash surface to remove winter salt residue, tire marks, and organic debris; allow to dry fully before re-sanding joints
- Stain and spill inspection: Treat any automotive fluid stains; consider sealer application if staining is recurring
- Edge restraint check: Verify edge restraint systems remain secure and intact; repair or replace any damaged sections
Cost & procurement considerations
Vehicle-rated paver installations cost more than pedestrian applications because every component must meet higher standards. Thicker, stronger pavers command premium pricing—expect 60–80mm units to cost 30–50% more per square foot than standard 30–40mm pedestrian pavers. White limestone and specialty finishes add further cost over standard gray concrete pavers.
Subbase thickness and compaction drive significant labor and material costs. Adding 100mm of aggregate base depth and requiring 95%+ compaction with verification testing increases site prep costs substantially. Equipment access for heavy compaction machinery may require temporary construction roads or special arrangements.
Geotextiles and geogrid reinforcement add material cost but prevent expensive failures in marginal soil conditions. These are cost-effective insurance in clay-rich, expansive, or poorly drained soils.
Edge restraint systems suitable for vehicular applications cost more than plastic lawn edging. Concrete curbs, commercial-grade restraint systems, or haunched soldier courses require additional materials and skilled labor but are essential for long-term performance.
Precision installation commands higher labor rates. Vehicle-bearing installations require experienced installers who understand compaction techniques, screeding tolerance, and proper joint filling. Lowest-bid contractors lacking vehicular paver experience often deliver inadequate work requiring costly remediation.
Budget for ongoing maintenance. Joint sand replenishment, periodic cleaning, and eventual resealing or unit replacement are normal lifecycle costs. White pavers show staining and wear more readily than darker colors, requiring more frequent cleaning to maintain appearance.
Procurement and RFQ checklist for vehicle-bearing pavers
- Material specifications: Complete TDS showing compressive strength, flexural strength, water absorption, and abrasion resistance
- Lab test reports: Recent (within 12 months) ASTM test results from ISO/IEC 17025 accredited laboratory for proposed production lot
- Vehicle-rating certification: Manufacturer confirmation of suitability for intended vehicle loads
- Sample blocks: Physical samples from approved lot for independent testing or retention
- Base specification: Detailed aggregate type, gradation, placement depth, and compaction requirements (include required compaction percentage and test method)
- Edge restraint specification: Type and installation method for edge restraint system rated for vehicular loads
- Installer qualifications: References from minimum three completed vehicle-bearing paver projects; license and insurance verification
- Installation drawings: Site-specific plans showing base depth, drainage, edge details, and any special conditions
- Quality assurance protocol: Required field testing (density tests, proof-rolling) and documentation
- Warranty coverage: Explicit warranty terms covering workmanship, material defects, and structural performance for vehicular loads; note exclusions
- Maintenance requirements: Supplier-provided maintenance guidelines and schedules; clarify warranty compliance requirements
- Project schedule: Realistic timeline accounting for weather restrictions, compaction testing, and staged construction
Request all documentation before awarding contracts. Incomplete technical data or vague product specifications indicate potential problems.
Quick spec clause — non-legal template for vehicle-bearing paver installations
Template / non-legal
Natural Stone / Engineered Paver Driveway — Vehicular Application:
Provide pavers minimum 60mm thickness suitable for light vehicle loading (passenger cars, SUVs). Submit complete technical data sheet (TDS) and laboratory test reports showing compressive strength per ASTM C170, flexural strength per ASTM C99, and water absorption per ASTM C97. Reports shall be from ISO/IEC 17025 accredited laboratory, dated within twelve months, and reference specific production lot. Install over minimum 150mm compacted aggregate base (ASTM D2940 gradation or approved equal) placed in maximum 100mm lifts and compacted to 95% Standard Proctor density (ASTM D698); verify with field density testing at locations designated by engineer. Provide commercial-grade edge restraint system anchored per manufacturer specifications. Use polymeric jointing sand conforming to ASTM C144 or approved equal. Contractor shall demonstrate minimum three completed vehicle-bearing paver projects and provide references. Retain sample blocks from approved production lot. Warranty shall explicitly cover structural performance under specified vehicle loads for period of [specify years] subject to maintenance compliance.
Coastal, inland and high-altitude considerations for white outdoor pavers
White outdoor pavers can offer a bright, cooling surface and a clean aesthetic, but specification should always respond to local climate, exposure and maintenance realities. The notes below provide hypothetical, conditional guidance for six distinct U.S. cities and states, intended to inform early specification choices rather than describe completed work. Use these considerations as a starting point for conversations about finishes, thickness and supplier-led support when specifying white outdoor pavers for different environments.
Wilmington, Delaware
Wilmington’s coastal-influenced weather, humid summers and seasonal nor’easter exposure would make salt tolerance and drainage important factors when choosing white limestone pavers. For Wilmington one would typically recommend low-porosity stone with a honed or lightly textured finish to reduce glare and improve traction when surfaces are wet. As general guidance, 20–30 mm for patios; 30–40 mm for light vehicle areas could be specified depending on loading. Designers could also advise on perimeter drainage, corrosion-tolerant jointing and simple cleaning regimes to manage airborne salts. The supplier could provide boxed samples, technical datasheets, specification support and palletised delivery on request to local yards.
Fargo, North Dakota
Fargo’s continental climate, with cold winters, snow and occasional freeze–thaw cycles, would prioritise low water uptake and texture that helps traction in icy conditions. In Fargo it would be sensible to select low-porosity white limestone tiles with a textured or grooved finish to minimise surface slipperiness and reduce moisture ingress that can worsen freeze damage. Typical thickness guidance of 20–30 mm for patios; 30–40 mm for light vehicle areas would be a useful starting point alongside a frost-resistant sub-base. Specifiers could also consider compatible jointing tolerant of de-icing salts. The supplier could supply samples, technical datasheets, specification templates and palletised delivery if requested.
Little Rock, Arkansas
Little Rock’s warm, humid summers and periodic heavy rainfall would make stain resistance, slip performance and drainage detail important when specifying white limestone flooring. For Little Rock one could recommend low-porosity stone with a honed or subtly textured finish to balance a refined look with improved wet-weather grip and easier cleaning. As general guidance, 20–30 mm for patios; 30–40 mm for light vehicle areas would be appropriate, with attention to perimeter drainage and jointing that tolerates organic debris. The supplier could provide representative samples, full technical datasheets, specification support and palletised delivery to regional depots on request and could advise on maintenance intervals.
Bozeman, Montana
Bozeman’s high-altitude setting brings strong UV, cold winters with freeze–thaw potential and significant diurnal temperature swings, all of which would influence material choice and movement-joint design. In Bozeman it would be advisable to specify low-porosity white limestone paving tiles with a honed or lightly textured surface to reduce glare, moderate thermal response and assist grip during seasonal wet or icy conditions. Use typical guidance of 20–30 mm for patios; 30–40 mm for light vehicle areas in conjunction with movement joints sized for thermal cycling. The supplier could supply boxed samples, technical datasheets, specification advice and palletised delivery to local supply points.
Des Moines, Iowa
Des Moines’ continental climate—hot, humid summers and cold winters with snow—would make durable finishes, clear drainage and low absorption key considerations for long-term appearance. For Des Moines one would generally specify low-porosity white limestone outdoor tiles with a textured or honed finish to aid traction when wet and to reduce water uptake that contributes to freeze damage. As a rule of thumb, 20–30 mm for patios; 30–40 mm for light vehicle areas would be practical guidance, paired with frost-tolerant bedding and accessible cleaning approaches. The supplier could provide samples, technical datasheets, specification support and palletised delivery on request.
Cheyenne, Wyoming
Cheyenne’s high plains climate—cold winters with wind-driven snow, strong sun and wide temperature swings—would place emphasis on UV durability, low porosity and robust edge detailing when specifying white limestone slabs. In Cheyenne it would be typical to choose low-porosity materials with a honed or subtly textured finish to reduce glare, manage thermal movement and improve grip in wet or icy spells. Typical guidance of 20–30 mm for patios; 30–40 mm for light vehicle areas could be applied, with recommended movement joints and a well-compacted sub-base. The supplier could offer boxed samples, detailed technical datasheets, specification support and palletised delivery to regional staging points.
FAQs — short answers
Can standard patio pavers handle cars?
No. Pedestrian-rated pavers (typically 30–40mm thick) lack the mass and strength to resist vehicle loads safely. They will crack or break under concentrated wheel loads even with proper base preparation.
Do I need a geotextile under my driveway base?
Usually yes, especially in clay-rich, expansive, or poorly drained soils. Geotextiles prevent aggregate intrusion into soft subgrade and soil pumping that undermines the base. Consult your engineer or installer for site-specific recommendations.
How often will joints need refilling?
Joint sand replenishment frequency depends on traffic, weather, and joint-fill type. Polymeric sand typically requires attention every 2–3 years; conventional sand may need annual replenishment. Inspect seasonally and add sand when depletion exceeds 10–15mm depth.
What about heavy delivery trucks?
Occasional light delivery vehicles (package delivery trucks) can use residential-grade driveway pavers. Regular heavy truck traffic (full-size moving trucks, concrete mixers, tractor-trailers) requires 80–100mm+ pavers, deeper engineered base, and potentially geogrid reinforcement. Consult an engineer for axle load calculations.
Will white pavers show tire marks?
Yes. White and light-colored pavers show tire marks, oil drips, and general soiling more readily than darker pavers. Plan for periodic power-washing (annually or as needed) to maintain appearance. Penetrating sealers can improve stain resistance.
Can I install pavers over existing concrete driveway?
Sometimes, if the existing concrete is structurally sound, level, and properly drained. This overlay approach requires thin-set mortar or pedestal systems rather than sand-set installation, and reduces vehicle clearance. Consult a qualified installer to evaluate existing slab condition.
What’s the difference between concrete and natural stone pavers for driveways?
Concrete pavers offer consistent strength, lower cost, and explicit vehicle ratings. Natural stone (limestone, granite) provides unique aesthetics but more variability in strength and durability. Both can perform well when properly specified—prioritize lab-tested, vehicle-rated products regardless of material type.
Do I need a structural engineer for a residential driveway?
While not always legally required, engineering consultation is prudent for challenging sites (poor soils, steep slopes, heavy vehicles) or high-value installations. Engineers provide load calculations, base design, and drainage solutions that prevent costly failures.
Conclusion & Citadel Stone CTA
White pavers driveway weight capacity depends entirely on the system: material strength and thickness, engineered subbase preparation, and robust edge restraint working together. Thin pavers or inadequate base guarantee failure; properly specified and installed vehicle-rated pavers deliver decades of durable performance. The difference is technical rigor in specification, procurement, and installation.
Don’t gamble on generic assurances or hope your paver choice can handle vehicles. Contact Citadel Stone today to request technical data sheets, vehicle-rated product specifications, and laboratory test reports for white pavers designed for driveway applications. Order sample blocks for independent verification testing, or schedule a technical consultation to review site-specific loading conditions, soil reports, and installation design. Citadel Stone’s technical team provides engineering liaison, witnessed sampling, and project-specific product recommendations to ensure your white paver driveway succeeds under real-world vehicle loads.
